<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Inside the Asylum</title>
	<link>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com</link>
	<description>Politics, Philosophy, and BS</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>
	<language>en</language>

		<item>
		<title>Democrats tough on Fijian military dictatorship? Not so much.</title>
		<link>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/07/democrats-tough-on-fijian-military-dictatorship-not-so-much/</link>
		<comments>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/07/democrats-tough-on-fijian-military-dictatorship-not-so-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Filthy Stinking No.9</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Politics</category>
		<guid>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/07/democrats-tough-on-fijian-military-dictatorship-not-so-much/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Instapundit links to a story with one of his usual short comments: "Tough on Fiji, Soft on Iran"  The point that both Reynolds and The Weekly Standard are trying to make is that the Obama regime is being a hypocrite in treating the military dictatorship in Fiji in a tough manner while they soft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/">Instapundit</a> links to <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/017/188gypey.asp">a story</a> with one of his usual short comments: "Tough on Fiji, Soft on Iran"  The point that both Reynolds and The Weekly Standard are trying to make is that the Obama regime is being a hypocrite in treating the military dictatorship in Fiji in a tough manner while they soft pedal in the other case. I only wish this were true. I <a href="http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/04/23/name-the-party/">posted on this matter earlier</a> about the real Democrat stance on Fiji. It could be described as positively supportive of the military regime in Fiji. Here's what Democrat Eni Faleomavaega (member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Vice Chair of the Congressional Asia Pacific American Caucus, member of the Congressional Human Rights Caucus, and member of the Congressional Oceans Caucus) had to say on the matter:</p>
	<blockquote><p>Australia and New Zealand were engaging in "nasty accusations" against Fiji and were "acting with a heavy hand" in trying to force elections... "I totally disagree with the nasty accusations that the leaders of New Zealand and Australia have made against Fiji … it makes no sense."</blockquote>
 When Clinton was asked what she thought of his comments, she declined to agree or disagree. So let's give the Obama regime credit for a thoroughly consistent pathetically soft stance on oppressive regimes. Tough on Fiji? I wish.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/07/democrats-tough-on-fijian-military-dictatorship-not-so-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Islam is Unreformable</title>
		<link>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/07/why-islam-is-unreformable/</link>
		<comments>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/07/why-islam-is-unreformable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Strangelove</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Religion</category>
	<category>Muslim World</category>
		<guid>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/07/why-islam-is-unreformable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Raymond Ibrahim takes up the question of whether Judaism and Christianity are as violent as Islam. He argues that the Qur'an endorses violence in a way that is quite different from that of the Old Testament (and that the New Testament does not endorse violence at all).
	When the Qur'an's violent verses are juxtaposed with their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Raymond Ibrahim takes up the question of whether <a href="http://www.meforum.org/2159/are-judaism-and-christianity-as-violent-as-islam">Judaism and Christianity are as violent as Islam</a>. He argues that the Qur'an endorses violence in a way that is quite different from that of the Old Testament (and that the New Testament does not endorse violence at all).</p>
	<blockquote><p>When the Qur'an's violent verses are juxtaposed with their Old Testament counterparts, they are especially distinct for using language that transcends time and space, inciting believers to attack and slay nonbelievers today no less than yesterday. God commanded the Hebrews to kill Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites—all specific peoples rooted to a specific time and place. At no time did God give an open-ended command for the Hebrews, and by extension their Jewish descendants, to fight and kill gentiles. On the other hand, though Islam's original enemies were, like Judaism's, historical (e.g., Christian Byzantines and Zoroastrian Persians), the Qur'an rarely singles them out by their proper names. Instead, Muslims were (and are) commanded to fight the people of the book—"until they pay the tribute out of hand and have been humbled"[13] and to "slay the idolaters wherever you find them."</p>
	<p>The two Arabic conjunctions "until" (hata) and "wherever" (haythu) demonstrate the perpetual and ubiquitous nature of these commandments: There are still "people of the book" who have yet to be "utterly humbled" (especially in the Americas, Europe, and Israel) and "idolaters" to be slain "wherever" one looks (especially Asia and sub-Saharan Africa). In fact, the salient feature of almost all of the violent commandments in Islamic scriptures is their open-ended and generic nature: "Fight them [non-Muslims] until there is no persecution and the religion is God's entirely.</p></blockquote>
	<p>The example of Muhammad's life and the early history of Islam do nothing to moderate this call to perpetual war.</p>
	<blockquote><p>Aside from the divine words of the Qur'an, Muhammad's pattern of behavior—his sunna or "example"—is an extremely important source of legislation in Islam. Muslims are exhorted to emulate Muhammad in all walks of life: "You have had a good example in God's Messenger." And Muhammad's pattern of conduct toward non-Muslims is quite explicit.</p>
	<p>Sarcastically arguing against the concept of moderate Islam, for example, terrorist Osama bin Laden, who enjoys half the Arab-Islamic world's support per an Al-Jazeera poll,[19] portrays the Prophet's sunna thusly:</p>
	<p>"Moderation" is demonstrated by our prophet who did not remain more than three months in Medina without raiding or sending a raiding party into the lands of the infidels to beat down their strongholds and seize their possessions, their lives, and their women.</p>
	<p>In fact, based on both the Qur'an and Muhammad's sunna, pillaging and plundering infidels, enslaving their children, and placing their women in concubinage is well founded. And the concept of sunna—which is what 90 percent of the billion-plus Muslims, the Sunnis, are named after—essentially asserts that anything performed or approved by Muhammad, humanity's most perfect example, is applicable for Muslims today no less than yesterday.</p></blockquote>
	<p>In all religions there are core texts, ideas, and examples that act as centers of gravitational attraction, continually pulling religious thought in particular directions even as it changes over time. In Islam the tide is always going to run towards violence because that is the direction in which the text of the Qur'an and the example of Muhammad's life will always pull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/07/why-islam-is-unreformable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nice-guy (bugs) get the girls</title>
		<link>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/nice-guy-bugs-get-the-girls/</link>
		<comments>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/nice-guy-bugs-get-the-girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Filthy Stinking No.9</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Science</category>
		<guid>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/nice-guy-bugs-get-the-girls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	This is kind of interesting. Previous experiments had seemed to confirm that hyper-aggressive males got more sex, cutting out the less aggressive ones, but this was only because experiments were conducted under conditions where the females couldn't move away from the area.
However, when the researchers opened gates between the chambers so they were all connected [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.physorg.com/news176652474.html">This</a> is kind of interesting. Previous experiments had seemed to confirm that hyper-aggressive males got more sex, cutting out the less aggressive ones, but this was only because experiments were conducted under conditions where the females couldn't move away from the area.<br />
<blockquote>However, when the researchers opened gates between the chambers so they were all connected and the insects could range more freely, things changed. Females left areas where they were harassed and congregated in regions of the tank that had only non-aggressive males. As a group, those males had significantly more successful matings than did the hyperaggressive males... </p>
	<p>"The naive view of Darwinian evolution is that it always favors the most savage, brutal and selfish behaviors. It doesn't -- and this is one example of that. In nature, groups of cooperative individuals are more successful than groups of selfish individuals."</blockquote>
  OK, we're talking about water striders, but it certainly <em>sounds</em> like it might have broader significance. It would be interesting to see a study of human female mating choices comparing situations where the women felt like they had little chance to leave an area, compared to females who could easily relocate. Would the ease of female relocation have an impact on male behavior as well?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/nice-guy-bugs-get-the-girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama backs his union buddies at cost of relations with China (again)</title>
		<link>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/obama-backs-his-union-buddies-at-cost-of-relations-with-china-again/</link>
		<comments>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/obama-backs-his-union-buddies-at-cost-of-relations-with-china-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Filthy Stinking No.9</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Politics</category>
	<category>Economics</category>
	<category>China</category>
		<guid>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/obama-backs-his-union-buddies-at-cost-of-relations-with-china-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	We've already had the stink about the tire tax Obama imposed on Chinese imports, which seriously annoyed the Chinese. So what can he do for an encore? I know ... another tariff on Chinese goods at the request of his union backers.
The US Commerce Department has imposed anti-dumping tariffs of up to 99 percent on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>We've already had the stink about the tire tax Obama imposed on Chinese imports, which <a href="http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/09/14/most-arrogant-white-house-in-history/">seriously annoyed the Chinese</a>. So what can he do for an encore? I know ... <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hthQv4UOHhBMsH96APvJDpTK01fw">another tariff on Chinese goods</a> at the request of his union backers.<br />
<blockquote>The US Commerce Department has imposed anti-dumping tariffs of up to 99 percent on imports of Chinese tubular goods."</blockquote>
 As could be expected, the Chinese are less than impressed.<br />
<blockquote>The Chinese commerce ministry said that China "firmly opposes the abuse of protectionism and will take measures to seriously protect the interests of the domestic industry." It called the US tariffs "discriminatory" steps that would "have a serious impact on the Chinese steel industry's exports."</blockquote>
 So who is happy about it?<br />
<blockquote>United Steelworkers (USW) union hailed the move as "an overdue message for thousands of American laid off workers that trade laws are being enforced."</blockquote>
 There's a surprise.   </p>
	<p>Seriously ... the Obama Regime are a pack of moronic amateurs. Obama is going to China in less than two weeks. Couldn't they have at least waited? I guess they think the Chinese will be overwhelmed by Obama's sparkling personality? Good luck with that.</p>
	<p>[Update] But wait:<a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-11/05/content_12393929.htm"> there's more</a>! It's even worse than I thought.<br />
<blockquote>The U.S. Commerce Department said on Tuesday it would impose punitive tariffs ranging from 2.02 percent to 437.73 percent on imports of steel wire decking from China. </blockquote>
 And the Chinese come right out and say it: The United States is acting the part of the hypocrite.<br />
<blockquote> It is hardly a week after Washington pledged actions against trade and investment protectionism at the 20th China-U.S. Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT) talks in China's eastern city of Hangzhou.  The United States vowed to refrain from any new trade protectionism measures at the event...<br />
Trade protectionism is a poison, which, if not properly handled, will reverse the first signs of world economic recovery. The United States, as the world's major economy, should take the lead in advocating responsible trade policies. Recent protectionist moves in the United States are closely linked to its sluggish economic growth and domestic political tussles, but a strong leader should have the guts to be more far-sighted and deliver the pledge he or she has made. </blockquote>
 So to summarize: the Chinese government controlled Xinhua news agency has just said that Barack Obama is irresponsible, weak, gutless, short-sighted, a liar, doesn't understand economics, and is putting the recovery at risk. Those inscrutable orientals. It's so hard to figure out what they're thinking.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/obama-backs-his-union-buddies-at-cost-of-relations-with-china-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insolent sex party</title>
		<link>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/insolent-sex-party/</link>
		<comments>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/insolent-sex-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Filthy Stinking No.9</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Politics</category>
	<category>Muslim World</category>
		<guid>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/insolent-sex-party/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Further to Egyptian action against Lebanese hottie Wehbe, now they're getting worked up about Beyonce. 
	"Why are you encouraging this insolent sex party?" lawmaker Hamdi Hassan from the opposition Muslim Brotherhood wrote in a letter to the government. "You are accused of disturbing social peace and stability, encouraging vice and debauchery."
Another Islamic lawmaker, Ali Laban, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Further to Egyptian <a href="http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/10/28/nubian-monkey/">action against Lebanese hottie Wehbe</a>, now they're <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/entertainment/music/2009/11/06/1257247733625.html">getting worked up about Beyonce</a>. </p>
	<blockquote><p>"Why are you encouraging this insolent sex party?" lawmaker Hamdi Hassan from the opposition Muslim Brotherhood wrote in a letter to the government. "You are accused of disturbing social peace and stability, encouraging vice and debauchery."<br />
Another Islamic lawmaker, Ali Laban, called for banning the "nudity concert."<br />
A Facebook campaign against Beyonce's concert collected nearly 10,000 supporters.<br />
But the war of words has not derailed the glitzy concert, due hundreds of miles south of Cairo in the luxury Red Sea resort of Port Ghalib.</blockquote>
 They're certainly doing a good job of promoting the event. Event organiser Ahmed Beltagi said<br />
<blockquote>"We should salute her instead of criticising her," he said of the diva.</blockquote>
 It seems he's in favor of insolent nude sex party concerts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/insolent-sex-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>First they infected the pigs, now the cats</title>
		<link>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/first-they-infected-the-pigs-now-the-cats/</link>
		<comments>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/first-they-infected-the-pigs-now-the-cats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Filthy Stinking No.9</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Science</category>
	<category>Weird</category>
		<guid>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/first-they-infected-the-pigs-now-the-cats/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Those filthy disease ridden primates (homo sapiens) having been spreading pestilence left right and center. First they infect poor innocent pigs, and now a cat has caught swine flu. In Egypt they slaughtered the entire pig population because they were afraid they'd spread swine flu (with a bunch of unforeseen consequences which shows they didn't [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Those filthy disease ridden primates (homo sapiens) having been spreading pestilence left right and center. <a href="http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/03/swine-flu-virus-crosses-between-pigs-and-humans/">First they infect poor innocent pigs</a>, and <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/SwineFluNews/iowa-cat-catches-swine-flu/story?id=8999295">now a cat has caught swine flu</a>. In Egypt they slaughtered the entire pig population because they were afraid they'd spread swine flu (with a bunch of <a href="http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/09/20/the-law-of-unintended-consequences/">unforeseen consequences</a> which shows they didn't listen to <a href="http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/04/10/wisdom-of-heinlein-part-3/">Heinlein's warning</a> about the dangers of indiscriminately killing hogs (and dragons)). When everyone was worried about Chicken Flu, they <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v422/n6929/full/422247b.html">slaughtered two million chickens in Holland</a> at least <a href="http://www.albionmonitor.com/9801a/chickenflu2.html">1.4 million in Hong Kong</a>, plus at least <a href="http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P3-1006133331.html">80,000 in India</a>, another <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4949026.stm">35,000 in England</a> and who knows how many world-wide? Well, now those dirty primates have started spreading a flu virus across species, what are we going to do about it? Filthy creatures.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/06/first-they-infected-the-pigs-now-the-cats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel finds ship full of weapons that doesn't belong to anyone</title>
		<link>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/israel-finds-ship-full-of-weapons-that-doesnt-belong-to-anyone/</link>
		<comments>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/israel-finds-ship-full-of-weapons-that-doesnt-belong-to-anyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Filthy Stinking No.9</dc:creator>
		
	<category>War</category>
		<guid>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/israel-finds-ship-full-of-weapons-that-doesnt-belong-to-anyone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Israel intercepted a ship in the Mediterranean carrying weapons and ammunition, and mysteriously, the cargo from Iran doesn't seem to belong to anyone. Israel says it was bound for Hezbollah, but they deny it. I guess Israel can now claim it as salvage.
[Update] In fact, it's even easier for Israel. Iran says the weapons on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-11/05/content_12393923.htm">Israel intercepted a ship</a> in the Mediterranean carrying weapons and ammunition, and mysteriously, the cargo from Iran doesn't seem to belong to anyone. Israel says it was bound for Hezbollah, but they deny it. I guess Israel can now claim it as salvage.<br />
[Update] In fact, it's even easier for Israel. <a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-11/05/content_12387776.htm">Iran says the weapons on the ship don't exist</a>, so I guess Israel can take them without having to claim anything, since the people who sent them deny they exist, and the people they were being sent to deny they own them. I guess it's just a cargo of ownerless non-existent weapons. Apparently there were 40 shipping containers. That's a lot of firepower to send on a Mediterranean cruise with no destination.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/israel-finds-ship-full-of-weapons-that-doesnt-belong-to-anyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Space elevator progress</title>
		<link>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/space-elevator-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/space-elevator-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Filthy Stinking No.9</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Science</category>
		<guid>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/space-elevator-progress/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	One of the "holy grails" of the space program is to successfully built a space elevator. Basically, you get a cable (a very strong cable) that extends from the surface of the earth far enough out into space so that natural forces allow it to just hang there on its own. Then you run an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One of the "holy grails" of the space program is to successfully built a space elevator. Basically, you get a cable (a very strong cable) that extends from the surface of the earth far enough out into space so that natural forces allow it to just hang there on its own. Then you run an elevator up and down it. Hey presto, you've solved the problem of having to use rockets to get into orbit. Naturally enough, there are a heck of a lot of engineering problems that will need to be solved before anything like it can be built. That's why it's encouraging to see that people are working on it, and even making <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news176545232.html">a little progress</a>.</p>
	<blockquote><p>LaserMotive of Seattle qualified for at least $900,000 in the $2 million NASA-backed Space Elevator Games, which began Wednesday at the Dryden Flight Research Center on Edwards Air Force Base. LaserMotive's vehicle climbed 2,953 feet (nearly 1 kilometer) in just over four minutes and then repeated the feat. </blockquote>
  Now wouldn't that be something to see a space elevator within my life time. Judging from NASA's progress in the last 40 years, I doubt there'll be anything like it until ... well, my grandkids time, even if we're lucky.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/space-elevator-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran: Talking to Obama would be naive and perverted</title>
		<link>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/iran-talking-to-obama-would-be-naive-and-perverted/</link>
		<comments>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/iran-talking-to-obama-would-be-naive-and-perverted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Filthy Stinking No.9</dc:creator>
		
	<category>General</category>
	<category>Politics</category>
	<category>Muslim World</category>
		<guid>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/iran-talking-to-obama-would-be-naive-and-perverted/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Hey, those are his words.
	Iran's Supreme Leader, spurning what he described as several personal overtures from US President Barack Obama, has warned that negotiating with the US was ''naive and perverted'' and said Iranian politicians should not be ''deceived'' into starting such talks.
 I wonder what he thinks they would talk about? Really, it's quite [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/world/dialogue-with-obama-a-trick-says-khamenei-20091104-hy0t.html">those</a> are his words.</p>
	<blockquote><p>Iran's Supreme Leader, spurning what he described as several personal overtures from US President Barack Obama, has warned that negotiating with the US was ''naive and perverted'' and said Iranian politicians should not be ''deceived'' into starting such talks.</blockquote>
 I wonder what he thinks they would talk about? Really, it's quite hard to be both naive and perverted at the same time.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/05/iran-talking-to-obama-would-be-naive-and-perverted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plane hits car, hot driver survives</title>
		<link>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/04/plane-hits-car-hot-driver-survives/</link>
		<comments>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/04/plane-hits-car-hot-driver-survives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Filthy Stinking No.9</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Weird</category>
		<guid>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/04/plane-hits-car-hot-driver-survives/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	OK, I admit that this is partly an excuse to post another clip of hot Lebanese singer Haife Wehbe, but that doesn't make it any less amazing. While filming this music video, a plane was supposed to fly low over the top of the car she was driving. It flew a bit too low, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>OK, I admit that this is partly an excuse to post another clip of hot Lebanese singer Haife Wehbe, but that doesn't make it any less amazing. While filming this music video, a plane was supposed to fly low over the top of the car she was driving. It flew a bit <em>too</em> low, and actually hit her vehicle. They mixed the real collision into the video, as viewed from an in-car camera. Stunning!</p>
	<p><object width="425" height="344"><br />
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/T4zJtKObhh4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/T4zJtKObhh4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidetheasylum.blogsome.com/2009/11/04/plane-hits-car-hot-driver-survives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
