Obama delivers some provocative words to North Korea. If I'm reading diplomatic language correctly (and assuming that Obama the Unready understands that words spoken in diplomacy carry particular meanings and subtexts, which is not a safe bet, I know) then Obama has threatened North Korea with a response that does not involve diplomacy, or which (at minimum) forces North Korea to engage in "diplomacy" as defined by Obama, and which is a strong response that will punish them.
Obama said "North Korea's actions over the last couple of months have been extraordinarily provocative... Diplomacy has to involve the other side engaging in a serious way in trying to solve problems, and we have not seen that kind of reaction from North Korea... We are going to take a very hard look at how we move toward... I don't think there will be an assumption that we will simply continue down the path in which North Korea is constantly destabilizing the region and we just react in the same ways. We are not intending to continue a policy of rewarding provocation."
Did Obama just threaten North Korea with attack? Does anyone know of any
other kind of response that involves punishing unwanted behavior that does
not involve diplomacy? It's possible that I'm over-reading this, but if I see it this way, does anyone care to take odds over whether the ultra paranoid North Koreans will read it in the same way?
So let's take a set of known facts: the North Koreans are armed to the teeth; the North Koreans are paranoid, regularly accusing USA and Japan of planning a "re-invasion"; the North Koreans have either achieved the ability to produce nuclear weapons or are very close to it depending on how you interpret their recent tests; it is possible to interpret Obama's words, delivered at the D-Day commemorations of all places, as a military threat.
Holy crap.