UN torture envoy: US must prosecute Bush lawyers. Manfred Nowak, who serves as a U.N. special rapporteur in Geneva, said Washington is obligated under the U.N. Convention against Torture to prosecute U.S. Justice Department officials who wrote memos that defined torture in the narrowest way in order to justify and legitimize it, and who assured CIA officials that their use of questionable tactics was legal.
As I always ask: what do we know about the person behind this? Well, Manfred Nowak is the same UN official who had
this to say in September 2006
He told journalists at a briefing in Geneva that he had yet to visit Iraq, but he was able to base his information on autopsies and interviews with Iraqis in neighbouring Jordan. "What most people tell you is that the situation as far as torture is concerned now in Iraq is totally out of hand," the Austrian law professor said. "The situation is so bad many people say it is worse than it has been in the times of Saddam Hussein," he added.
This is also the same Manfred Novak behind a report condemning Guantanamo despite
refusing a US invitation to visit the prison. His definition of the "torture" inflicted on prisoners at the prison included the fact that hunger-strikers were force fed.
Novak described his intellectual inspiration
"[A]s is well known," Nowak observed, the Commission had qualified the five "deep interrogation techniques" employed by the British security forces [in Northern Ireland] as torture. I can still well remember Ermacora's dismay when the [European] Court [of Human Rights], on the urging of the British judge, corrected the opinion of the Commission and found the British forces responsible for "merely" inhumane treatment. More than 30 years later, I am now, in my role as U.N. Special Rapporteur on Torture, charged with the qualification of similar interrogation methods employed by the USA in Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, and other camps. I think, in this difficult question, I will permit myself to be inspired by the legal opinion of my former teacher rather than by the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights."